Googling Goeglein

Tim Goeglein, plagiarist


It amazes me that any high-profile writer (even one that
works in the Bush Administration) could be stupid enough
to commit plagiarism in the modern age of Google.

How embarrassing.


[h/t Atrios]

The Times, They Are A-Suckin'

Leave it to the pinheads at the NY Times to print an article
that is so poorly sourced and edited, it makes them look
like even bigger tools than usual -- while simultaneously
rallying conservatives around McCain.

But the real kicker is they actually expected to get
high-fives from Democrats.

Q. I must say that the McCain article left
me embarrassed for your paper. So little
substance, but trumpeted prominently as
though you somehow had the goods on him
or were raising burning questions. It
makes it look like your reporters or
editors had an ax to grind. I hope they
didn't. Question: Do you read the coverage
of your coverage? Did you see the piece
at slate.com ridiculing your paper for this?
Doesn't it smart?

— Brian Mullaney

A. I think we all expected the reaction
to be intense. We knew from our experience
last year, when word leaked out we were
pursuing this story, that Senator McCain's
operatives would set out to change the
subject by making the story about The
New York Times rather than about their
candidate.That's a time-honored tactic for
dealing with potentially damaging news
stories. We knew some readers would
disagree with our decision to publish this
information. After all, we wrestled with
our own doubts on that score. We anticipated
that it would provoke at least a brief media
firestorm — and that our efforts to put
Mr. McCain's relationship with a lobbyist
in a bigger context would probably get lost
in the retelling.

Personally, I was surprised by the volume
of the reaction (including more than 2,400
reader comments posted on our Web site).
I was surprised by how lopsided the opinion
was against our decision, with readers who
described themselves as independents and
Democrats joining Republicans in defending
Mr. McCain from what they saw as a cheap
shot.

Whitewater... Wen Ho Lee... Jason Blair... Judith Miller...
And an op-ed page that is truly an intellectual sewer.

Yet the Times editors are surprised that no one from the
left is standing up to defend their shoddy journalism
against a livid Rush Limbaugh.

Hilarious.

Less Jobs, More Wars

The Republican Party has spoken, and they want John McCain
for their president. I'll admit the logic behind that decision
is a bit hard for a dirty, liberal hippie like me to understand.
But luckily, we have conservatives like Pat Buchanan and
Joe Scarborough to explain his unique appeal to GOP voters.

BUCHANAN: Here’s a guy, basically, what
does he say? The jobs are never coming back,
the illegals are never going home, but we’re
gonna have a lot more wars.

SCARBOROUGH: We’re gonna start a lot of
wars! He has promised, for the record Keith,
John McCain’s platform — and it certainly
looks inviting for the fall — he has promised
less jobs and more wars. Now that’s something
we can all rally behind.

"Less jobs, more wars." It's got a nice ring to it, no?